![]() |
|
|||||||||||
| Inmates, officials say prisons still crowded | |||||||||||
|
03/15/04 KYLE
WINGFIELD ELMORE - Last summer,
Lyndahl Sale was one 1,423 male inmates shipped from overcrowded Alabama
prisons to a private lockup in Mississippi. While the inmates were
gone, Alabama officials worked to fix the overcrowding problem. They
increased paroles for nonviolent offenders. They moved low-security
prisoners to work-release centers and transferred work-release prisoners
to community corrections centers. They found alternative sentences for
1,700 inmates otherwise headed for prison. The result? "It hasn't
changed at all," said Sale, an inmate at Elmore Correctional
Facility. "Just like
(before), I can lay in my bed, and without getting up, without stretching
very far, I can reach over and touch the man in the bed next to me,"
said Sale, 38, who's served almost 15 years of a life sentence for murder.
"If you stand up to open your locker box that's under your bed, you
have to be careful, or you're practically sitting on a man if he happens
to be in the bed next to you." Alabama's prison
system didn't become crowded overnight, and Prison Commissioner Donal
Campbell knows better than to expect the problems to disappear so quickly.
"There's not a
whole lot I can do to reduce the population," Campbell said. "We
may find other beds. Hopefully, at some point, I'll be able to work with
the counties and have funding appropriated to rent beds from the counties.
But that's not going to be significant." The only significant
solution would be a financial windfall: A pipe dream in a state struggling
with revenue shortfalls in the hundreds of millions of dollars. With that in mind,
Campbell, the inmates and the head of a prison advocacy group offered less
costly suggestions. Among them: Parole violations.
Change the punishment for technical parole violators. Increased paroles
are under way, and with them a likely spike in parole violators. Dealing
with re-offenders is one downside of stepping up paroles, but officials
could ease the problem by coming up with a new way to deal with parolees
who violate a condition of parole but do not commit a new crime. Such violations
include breaking curfew or crossing state lines without permission. Campbell said the
state needs a program for technical parole violators "where we would
develop criteria for a certain violator, they would be required to go
through a program, whether it be six months or seven months or four months
or what have you, and then they would be re-paroled by the board ...
rather than bringing them back into the system, taking up an expensive bed
that we so desperately need for violent offenders." The parole board is
open to some changes, provided they don't threaten public safety, said
Cynthia Dillard, assistant director of Pardons and Paroles. Technical
violations often are precursors to repeat offenses, she said. Closer looks. Let the
parole board get to know inmates better. When 46-year-old Sylvester Turner
is up for parole in July, the only people who will meet with the parole
board are his family, friends and anyone who wants to protest his release.
"I think that one
of the things that the parole board probably needs to (do) ... is come to
the institution and set up a conference with the inmate that's coming up
for parole," said Turner, midway through a 20-year sentence for
manslaughter and attempted murder. "But also have
the officer there he works up under, that sees him every day, for really
what he does every day, and get a report from him." Simply arranging for
prisoners and parole members to be in the same room is the biggest
obstacle to accomplishing those changes, Dillard said. The board has heard
7,564 cases since April 6, 2003, when Gov. Bob Riley gave the board the
funding to quicken its pace. As for bringing parole
board members to the prisons, Dillard said, "We hold so many
hearings, there's no way the board could visit all the institutions and
hold the hearings they do." Community time. Expand
community corrections. Campbell already has moved about 2,000 inmates to
community-based programs where they work jobs and in many cases even live
at home. Shifting more inmates
from state prisons to community corrections could save the state space and
money in some less obvious ways, said Lucia Penland, director of the
Alabama Prison Project. |
|||||||||||