![]() |
|
|||||||||||
| Laws worsen prison problems | |||||||||||
|
3/12/ 2004 Surely no one in Alabama has a better perspective on the states prison problems than Donal Campbell. As prison commissioner, he has the dual challenge of addressing short-term issues and looking for long-term solutions and that makes his observations on Alabamas sentencing structure worthy of serious attention. Campbell has been
forced into some short-term measures, such as sending inmates to
out-of-state prisons, in order to ease, albeit temporarily, the severe
overcrowding in the system. This has kept federal court intervention at
bay, at least for the moment. But Campbell
acknowledges the harsh reality that the state is really just spinning its
wheels without major reform of sentencing. As long as we have the laws we
have today, its not going to change, he said. It's not. It can't.
Alabama has seen its prison population explode from about 5,500 inmates 20
years ago to more than 28,000 today. That's more than twice the number of
inmates the facilities of the Department of Corrections are built to
handle.Those inmate numbers might make sense if there were five times the
crime of 20 years ago, but there isn't. Instead, the overcrowding is
largely the result of a flawed sentencing structure that, simply put,
sends too many people to prison who could and should be sentenced to
alternative programs that are less expensive and more productive. We've gotten ourselves
in this state in a situation that solutions to our problems are going to
be more expensive than they would have been if we had attacked the problem
on the front end, Campbell said. That is the
unfortunate legacy of years of supposedly tough-on-crime measures that
historically have been popular with politicians and with voters. It leaves
Campbell in a tough spot in which the system needs more prison space for
the inmates it has now, but also needs reform of the sentencing structure
to send more inmates into alternative programs in the future. Campbell favors
community corrections programs as an alternative. These programs allow
nonviolent offenders to remain in or near their communities while working
to pay for the costs of their incarceration and make restitution to the
victims of their crimes. Why put someone like this in a penitentiary? |
|||||||||||