![]() |
|
|||||||||||
| Halfway help | |||||||||||
|
03/12/04 The
dispute between the city of Birmingham and a Woodlawn halfway house is
unfortunate, for sure. No one wants to see prison parolees abruptly
uprooted from their homes when they're just starting to get their lives
together. But the story about
the city pulling the plug on Neighborhood House highlighted a far bigger
problem: The state isn't regulating this halfway house or many others that
will shelter a growing number of parolees from Alabama's prisons. "There is no
oversight of halfway houses," said Cynthia Dillard, assistant
executive director of the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles.
"Anybody can throw up a shingle and say they're a halfway house, and
most of them are for profit." Neighborhood House
says it's not about the profits. Indeed, it's being shut down by the city
not because of any particular problem with its business, but because the
property was supposed to go to another buyer under a federal program to
provide low-income housing. But details that
emerged about the Neighborhood House operation still raise questions. At
its 32-unit complex on Second Avenue North, a single apartment houses four
parolees, each of whom is supposed to pay $90 a week. That gives
Neighborhood House $1,440-a-month rent for a single apartment - far above
the going rate in Woodlawn and every other market in Birmingham. Operators of
Neighborhood House say the figure is misleading, and not just because
residents sometimes fall behind on their rent. While residents have to pay
an extra $4 a day for transportation, their rent covers utilities and a
number of other services - such as counseling, referrals and property
maintenance. Still, the price is
awfully steep for residents who have nothing. Even if Neighborhood House
has the best of intentions, it's clear that an unscrupulous halfway house
operator could take advantage of parolees who are under the gun to
maintain stability and may have few other places to go. A bill in the
Legislature doesn't go far enough to provide oversight to halfway houses.
But it would at least require all halfway houses to get a license from a
local sheriff and go through a public hearing before opening for business.
Currently, halfway
houses are governed, if at all, by scattered local rules. In Birmingham,
for instance, halfway houses get health inspections as communal living
facilities, Dillard said. That's not enough. Nor
is it enough that the parole board can refuse to send parolees to halfway
houses that generate complaints or for some reason don't measure up. Look
at the Neighborhood House: The parole board wasn't aware of problems
there, despite the high rents being charged, despite the property dispute
that ended with parolees' sudden eviction. An agency needs staff,
resources and authority to establish and enforce rules for halfway houses.
The parole board says it's in no shape to take on a new responsibility,
and you can be sure no other strapped agency is eager to take on the task.
|
|||||||||||