![]() |
|
|||||||||||
| Medical contracts for prisons delayed | |||||||||||
|
Panel: No bids taken
for work KIM
CHANDLER MONTGOMERY - A
legislative panel delayed medical care contracts for state prisons
Thursday, complaining that the Department of Corrections didn't take bids
for the nearly $170 million in work. Two members of the
Joint Legislative Contract Review Committee complained that the prison
system didn't use a bid process to pick who will provide health care to
state inmates. Republican Gov. Bob Riley frequently criticized then-Gov.
Don Siegelman's use of no-bid contracts during the 2002 election. However, Department of
Corrections Commissioner Donal Campbell said the prison system took
proposals and selected the cheapest companies. That's essentially the same
as a formal bid process, he said. The state isn't required to use a bid
process on professional service contracts. "We feel we
selected the best vendor at the lowest cost to provide that service,"
Campbell said. Committee members
delayed a $143 million contract with Prison Health Services of Brentwood,
Tenn., to provide medical care for three years and a $29 million contract
with MHM Correctional Services Inc. of Vienna, Va., to provide mental
health care. The committee also
delayed a $90,000 contract with Correctional Medical Management of
Nashville, Tenn., to monitor the work. The committee does not
have the authority to kill state government contracts, but it can delay
them for 45 days. The state had hired
Birmingham-based NaphCare Inc. to provide the service, but Campbell
canceled that contract, extending it month-to-month until a new contract
could be awarded. A state audit said NaphCare was providing
"extremely poor quality health care," but the company disputed
those findings. The prison system
opened proposals in September for the new medical services contract. The committee also
rejected a plan by Riley's Department of Finance to hire a
Birmingham-based consulting firm, Vantage Associates Inc., to provide
strategic planning for the state. The company would be paid $37,900 for
nine months of work. |
|||||||||||